PGov Delegate Thread

[PGov]

RRC-36 Rumble.exchange - DAO Support Proposal

We voted Against: While interesting we decided to vote against this proposal as we don’t think it will be very successful on its own, especially long term. There is a lack of comprehensive details on the project’s sustainability and its potential impact on the RARI ecosystem. Additionally, a unclear and lack of follow ups is concerning as it is needed for future milestone funding.

RRC-37: RARI Foundation 2025 Operational Budget

We voted Yes: This proposed 2025 operational budget for the RARI Foundation is a strategic investment in the continued growth and decentralization of the RARI ecosystem. The focus on transitioning governance to the RARI chain, supporting key ecosystem projects, and executing a treasury diversification strategy demonstrates a strong continued commitment to the DAO.

This budget is very reasonable and we are in support. Looking forward to the upcoming year!

RRC 38: Updating and Migrating Delegate Launchpad Program to RARI chain

We voted Yes: Upgrading and migrating the Delegate Launchpad Program to the RARI chain makes a lot of sense and further achieves the DAOs goals. Key adjustments include maintaining a constant voting power allocation over a six-month period without decay, allowing delegates to apply for multiple cohorts with increased delegation upon repeated acceptance, and integrating the Event Horizon delegation model to enhance governance efficiency.

RRC-39: Multichain Primary & Secondary Protocol Fees

We voted Yes: Implementing multi chain primary and secondary protocol fees is a logical move that aligns with RARI DAO’s objectives of increasing revenue streams and promoting sustainable growth.

With expanding fee collection to multiple chains and introducing a primary protocol fee for NFT mints, the DAO can capture previously missed revenue from secondary trading across various supported chains.

RRC-40: RARI DAO Delegate Incentive Program

We voted Yes: This Delegate Incentive Program is a good approach at enhancing governance participation by rewarding active and engaged delegates. This should result in a lot more forum discussions going forward and should address delegate disengagement and low voter turnout.

[PGov]

RRC 41: Response to RRC 39 - Proposed Mechanics of Secondary Fee Collection

We voted Yes: ​We support the proposed fee collection mechanism outlined because it establishes a clear and efficient process for aggregating secondary market fees across multiple blockchain ecosystems, ensuring these funds are properly transferred to the DAO treasury. By effectively managing fee collection, the DAO can maintain transparency and operational efficiency across various chains.

[PGov]

RRC-42: Q1 2025 RARI DAO Delegate Incentive Program Report

We voted For: Thanks to @jarisjames for the super indepth analysis and breakdown of the first quarter of rewards. We look forward to continue contributing to the DAO and are excited for the future!

[PGov]

[RRC-43] Rari Staking Incentives Program

We voted For: Thanks to the Stablelabs team and co for getting this proposal to vote. We think the budget makes a lot of sense, is reasonable, and the scope are appropriate. We need some way to get users attracted to Rari and stake on Rarichain; this is a good first step.

[PGov]

Test Poposal DAO v2 - 1
Test proposal DAO v2 - 2 (Security Council veto test)

We voted For & For: Voting in favor of these test votes as recommended by the core team. We’re excited to be voting on Rari Chain!

RRC-44: Response to Current Crypto Markets & DAO Strategic Workshop

We voted For: With recent market and foundation leds initiatives and movements, we believe this dao strategy is logical and should be implemented going forward.

[PGov]

[RRC-45] Fund Phase 1 of RARI Staking Rewards

We voted For: Excited for the first real proposal on Rari Chain! These rewards have received prety much unanimous support across the DAO and we think that it makes sense to fund this first phase with this reward allocation.

[PGov]

RRC-46: Q2 2025 RARI DAO Delegate Incentive Program Report

We voted For: In line with what we expect from the delegate program. Thanks to @jarisjames for promptly getting this sorted.

RRC-47: Q2 2025 Delegate Incentive Program Report (amendment)

We voted For: Similar logic to above, with the community accepted rates and adjustments.

[PGov]

Grow3dge Accelerator: Strategic Support for Rari Foundation and DAO Growth

We voted For: This program could attract a lot of potentially interested members and we think is very high relative value given the low costs. We are voting in favor!

[PGov]

RRC-48: Rarible Creator Fund Program

We voted For: We are in favor of this fund to grant Rarible Creators and true users of the protocol. The budget and scope seem very reasonable for this season!

[PGov]

[RRC-49] Disbursement of Superboard Quest Rewards

We voted For: We are in favor of executing this transaction that funds the Superboard Quest campaign winners and POAP/Raffle winners. No concerns as budgets were all as expected.

[PGov]

RRC-50: Set Rarible ExchangeV2 Protocol Fee

We voted For: Updating the Rarible ExchangeV2 protocol fee parameters to 200 bps sellers fee and buyer fee at 0 bps is agreeable and we are aligned with the collected fees being swapped into RARI and distributed back to users through RARI claims based on the points they’ve collected.

[PGov]

RRC-51: Establishment of the Rarible Creator Fund Working Group

We voted For: In favor of establishing this creator fund working group. We see this a big win for potential grant applicants and thank the foundation for stepping in to cover costs.

[PGov]

RRC-52: RARI DAO Security Council Election Proposal

We voted For: Congrats to @jarisjames and @forexus for winning the elections. We are confident they will be great stewards to the DAO for the security council elections.

RRC-51: Treasury Management Empowerment Program

We voted For: We believe it makes sense to transfer treasury control to the RARI Foundation so the Foundation will manage day-to-day ops. The DAO still retains strategic oversight, setting clear, high-level objectives and governance rules. In favor of the current set up!

[PGov]

RRC-52: Set Rarible ExchangeV2 Protocol Fee

We voted For: In favor of setting the seller fee at 200 bps (2%), the buyer fee at 0 bps, and route all fees to a dedicated recipient wallet. Also a fan of swapping all fees to Rari.

[PGov]

RRC-53: Proposal to support the “Return to Form” Group drop and Gallery event

We voted For: This gallery event seems very in line with what we think productive exhibits for the dao should look like. The budget is rather reasonable and the outputs and compensation is just.

[PGov]

RRC-53: Set Rarible ExchangeV2 Protocol Fee Proposal executed & RRC-54: Rarible ExchangeV2 Account Abstraction Support

We voted For & For: Similar reasoning as above, we are in favor of setting the seller fee at 200 bps (2%), the buyer fee at 0 bps, and route all fees to a dedicated recipient wallet. Also a fan of swapping all fees to Rari.

[PGov]

RRC‑XX: Fund Phase 2 of RARI Staking Rewards

We voted For: In line with prior DAO commitments. We think the budget and use cases are still reasonable and are in support of the RARI staking rewards renewal.

[PGov]

Activate DAO ETH Held on Rari Chain Through Staking

We voted For: In favor of activating the 20+ ETH by staking it and earning passive income. No issues from our end.

[PGov]

RRC-55: Reduce Sell Fee to 1.5% to Enhance User-Friendliness

We are NOT IN SUPPORT: In favor of this fee adjustment ideologically as it becomes more competitive with other platforms. However, as highlighted by the foundation, proper forum discussion was not had. We recommend the proposer to approach the forums and follow the proper governance process.

Edit: Changing support after highlighting of concerns by the Foundation.

[PGov]

[RFC] RARI Governance Cleanup: Canonical Governance & Delegate Renewal

We voted For: The split between v1 on Ethereum and v2 on RARI Chain has been a real source of confusion, and consolidating binding decisions back on Mainnet while keeping RARI Chain for ecosystem coordination and signaling is the cleanest way to resolve it. The proposed Governor and Timelock parameters are sensible defaults, and narrowing the Security Council to pause, operational reversal, and blocking harmful payloads keeps emergency powers scoped to where they belong. We also like the cohort-based delegate relaunch, since onboarding has been harder than it should be and a structured intake gives new delegates a real path in. Glad to see this published as a temperature check with the direction shaped by community feedback before the binding migration steps execute.