RRC 41: Response to RRC 39 - Proposed Mechanics of Secondary Fee Collection
We voted Yes: We support the proposed fee collection mechanism outlined because it establishes a clear and efficient process for aggregating secondary market fees across multiple blockchain ecosystems, ensuring these funds are properly transferred to the DAO treasury. By effectively managing fee collection, the DAO can maintain transparency and operational efficiency across various chains.
RRC-42: Q1 2025 RARI DAO Delegate Incentive Program Report
We voted For: Thanks to @jarisjames for the super indepth analysis and breakdown of the first quarter of rewards. We look forward to continue contributing to the DAO and are excited for the future!
[RRC-43] Rari Staking Incentives Program
We voted For: Thanks to the Stablelabs team and co for getting this proposal to vote. We think the budget makes a lot of sense, is reasonable, and the scope are appropriate. We need some way to get users attracted to Rari and stake on Rarichain; this is a good first step.
Test Poposal DAO v2 - 1
Test proposal DAO v2 - 2 (Security Council veto test)
We voted For & For: Voting in favor of these test votes as recommended by the core team. We’re excited to be voting on Rari Chain!
RRC-44: Response to Current Crypto Markets & DAO Strategic Workshop
We voted For: With recent market and foundation leds initiatives and movements, we believe this dao strategy is logical and should be implemented going forward.
[RRC-45] Fund Phase 1 of RARI Staking Rewards
We voted For: Excited for the first real proposal on Rari Chain! These rewards have received prety much unanimous support across the DAO and we think that it makes sense to fund this first phase with this reward allocation.
RRC-46: Q2 2025 RARI DAO Delegate Incentive Program Report
We voted For: In line with what we expect from the delegate program. Thanks to @jarisjames for promptly getting this sorted.
RRC-47: Q2 2025 Delegate Incentive Program Report (amendment)
We voted For: Similar logic to above, with the community accepted rates and adjustments.
Grow3dge Accelerator: Strategic Support for Rari Foundation and DAO Growth
We voted For: This program could attract a lot of potentially interested members and we think is very high relative value given the low costs. We are voting in favor!
RRC-48: Rarible Creator Fund Program
We voted For: We are in favor of this fund to grant Rarible Creators and true users of the protocol. The budget and scope seem very reasonable for this season!
[RRC-49] Disbursement of Superboard Quest Rewards
We voted For: We are in favor of executing this transaction that funds the Superboard Quest campaign winners and POAP/Raffle winners. No concerns as budgets were all as expected.
RRC-50: Set Rarible ExchangeV2 Protocol Fee
We voted For: Updating the Rarible ExchangeV2 protocol fee parameters to 200 bps sellers fee and buyer fee at 0 bps is agreeable and we are aligned with the collected fees being swapped into RARI and distributed back to users through RARI claims based on the points they’ve collected.
RRC-51: Establishment of the Rarible Creator Fund Working Group
We voted For: In favor of establishing this creator fund working group. We see this a big win for potential grant applicants and thank the foundation for stepping in to cover costs.
RRC-52: RARI DAO Security Council Election Proposal
We voted For: Congrats to @jarisjames and @forexus for winning the elections. We are confident they will be great stewards to the DAO for the security council elections.
RRC-51: Treasury Management Empowerment Program
We voted For: We believe it makes sense to transfer treasury control to the RARI Foundation so the Foundation will manage day-to-day ops. The DAO still retains strategic oversight, setting clear, high-level objectives and governance rules. In favor of the current set up!
RRC-52: Set Rarible ExchangeV2 Protocol Fee
We voted For: In favor of setting the seller fee at 200 bps (2%), the buyer fee at 0 bps, and route all fees to a dedicated recipient wallet. Also a fan of swapping all fees to Rari.
RRC-53: Proposal to support the “Return to Form” Group drop and Gallery event
We voted For: This gallery event seems very in line with what we think productive exhibits for the dao should look like. The budget is rather reasonable and the outputs and compensation is just.
RRC-53: Set Rarible ExchangeV2 Protocol Fee Proposal executed & RRC-54: Rarible ExchangeV2 Account Abstraction Support
We voted For & For: Similar reasoning as above, we are in favor of setting the seller fee at 200 bps (2%), the buyer fee at 0 bps, and route all fees to a dedicated recipient wallet. Also a fan of swapping all fees to Rari.
RRC‑XX: Fund Phase 2 of RARI Staking Rewards
We voted For: In line with prior DAO commitments. We think the budget and use cases are still reasonable and are in support of the RARI staking rewards renewal.
Activate DAO ETH Held on Rari Chain Through Staking
We voted For: In favor of activating the 20+ ETH by staking it and earning passive income. No issues from our end.
RRC-55: Reduce Sell Fee to 1.5% to Enhance User-Friendliness
We are NOT IN SUPPORT: In favor of this fee adjustment ideologically as it becomes more competitive with other platforms. However, as highlighted by the foundation, proper forum discussion was not had. We recommend the proposer to approach the forums and follow the proper governance process.
Edit: Changing support after highlighting of concerns by the Foundation.
[RFC] RARI Governance Cleanup: Canonical Governance & Delegate Renewal
We voted For: The split between v1 on Ethereum and v2 on RARI Chain has been a real source of confusion, and consolidating binding decisions back on Mainnet while keeping RARI Chain for ecosystem coordination and signaling is the cleanest way to resolve it. The proposed Governor and Timelock parameters are sensible defaults, and narrowing the Security Council to pause, operational reversal, and blocking harmful payloads keeps emergency powers scoped to where they belong. We also like the cohort-based delegate relaunch, since onboarding has been harder than it should be and a structured intake gives new delegates a real path in. Glad to see this published as a temperature check with the direction shaped by community feedback before the binding migration steps execute.
Untitled proposal transferring 500,000 RARI to the proposer
We voted Against: This is an unsolicited on-chain proposal with a blank title and description, no forum discussion, and no RFC or governance process behind it, whose single executable action transfers 500,000 RARI from the DAO to the proposer’s own wallet. The proposer submitted it with empty metadata and is voting it through with their own tokens, which is the profile of a treasury-drain attempt rather than a legitimate governance action. We voted Against and encourage other delegates to do the same, since executing an unexplained self-transfer that never passed through any part of Rari’s normal process would directly harm the DAO.