Since you probably didn’t see this mentioned in any recent highlights from the team: Bitget, one of the largest global crypto exchanges, officially delisted $RARI as of this month.
Withdrawals remain open until July 30.
What’s striking is how closely these reasons match concerns the community has voiced for months — only this time, someone outside the DAO actually acted on them.
Yes, governance is still technically alive. Proposals are being written. But when major exchanges quietly exit the stage, maybe it’s worth asking who all the effort is really serving.
Is it the broader community — or a small group, quietly drawing millions from the treasury each year, while delivering increasingly little in terms of real-world traction?
No drama, just facts.
Sometimes, outside signals speak louder than internal optimism.
You’re right, I can’t deny that. And yes, I’m still quietly checking in on the forums. The truth is, I started building here because of @forexus. I never really wanted to leave, but I had to. Honestly, it ended up being one of the worst experiences I’ve had on any chain. I genuinely feel for those still trying to deliver quality on what increasingly feels like a sinking ship.
I had the potential to deliver a range of tools and platforms, exactly what the remaining community was asking for, especially around NFTs. But the foundation was too focused on gatekeeping while being completely disconnected from what’s actually gaining traction in the broader crypto space.
They wasted months of my time in endless discussions, and the communication, especially from a business development perspective, was deeply unprofessional. That’s not how things should be run. Out of respect, I won’t share details or screenshots, but if I did, it would seriously damage the reputations of the foundation, and several former foundation members.
When I saw Dzonson’s post, I couldn’t stay silent. He knows the truth, and so do many others.
Welcome back @dzonson.eth, and thanks for sharing this info and your concerns. The announcement seems to relate to multiple delistings, so it’s difficult to say for sure which of these reasonings was crucial for RARI. Could we maybe get an update from foundation from your perspective?
There are other listings on major exchanges, so I’d not suggest putting additional funds in this. Rather, some on-chain liquidity for RARI would be a priority.