Feedback on rarible.fun: Missing Features for Artists & Collectors

As a long-time community member and RARI delegate, I want to share feedback on the recent switch from rarible.com to the rarible.fun layout. I’m writing this with respect for the platform and the work behind it, but also with urgency — because these changes risk alienating both collectors and artists, the people who give Rarible its meaning.

Main Concerns

  • Art takes a backseat to data
    The new layout feels more like a spreadsheet than an art platform. Artwork is minimized while most of the space is taken up by historical pricing data. This reduces the cultural and emotional impact of the art, flattening it into numbers instead of giving it the presence it deserves.

  • Broken bookmarks and links
    Every NFT link I’ve bookmarked, referenced in writing, or shared with others pointed to rarible.com. With the switch, those links are now useless. This undermines trust and continuity, and it devalues years of documentation for both collectors and artists.

  • Profiles feel empty
    My rarible.com profile no longer displays my collected NFTs. To see anything at all, I’m forced to go through og.rarible.com, which feels like being sent to a graveyard. This strips away the sense of pride and ownership that collectors once had when showing their profiles.

  • Unified, inclusive view long gone
    One of Rarible’s strongest features used to be the ability to view NFTs across chains in one place. When Tezos was supported in the main view, Rarible felt like the most inclusive NFT platform. But that spirit disappeared when Tezos support was removed a year or two ago, and today collections remain fragmented instead of unified. Without a true cross-chain home, Rarible loses some of its competitive edge as a hub for the NFT ecosystem.

What Artists Need

Rebecca Rose recently laid out what she wants from an NFT platform in this post, and many other artists have echoed similar needs. Artists require more than just a marketplace; they need spaces that contextualize their work, protect their legacy, and make it easy for collectors to engage. That means:

  • Portfolio pages – A permanent record of everything created across chains and marketplaces.
  • Available works pages – A reliable section with working links to current listings and marketplaces.
  • Comprehensive inventory – Organized indexes of works across chains with consistent metadata and provenance.
  • CVs and exhibition history – Documented milestones showing relevance and contributions to the movement.
  • Bios and artist statements – Communicating who they are and why they create, building trust and connection.
  • Process and behind-the-scenes content – Showing the human story behind the work.
  • Press and features – A curated record of recognition, strengthening credibility for curators and historians.
  • Talks and panels – Recorded conversations and presentations, preserving artists’ voices alongside their art.

What Collectors Need

Collectors are not just buyers — we are archivists, curators, and promoters of the culture that keeps this ecosystem alive. To do that well, we need tools that make our contributions visible and meaningful. That means:

  • Unified cross-chain collection view – A single place to see and share holdings across all chains.
  • Custom organization – The ability to group works by artist or theme (e.g., all Zafgod pieces across chains, or a luau-themed gallery).
  • Gallery/showcase creation – Tools to curate exhibitions that highlight both individual works and larger narratives, with the option to sell them as full sets or individually.
  • Collector’s “portfolio site” features – A hub that communicates who we are, why we collect, and how our collections evolve.
  • Transaction history & provenance tools – Clear, exportable records of purchases, sellers, dates, and prices.
  • Valuation insights – Portfolio-level stats that inform decisions but don’t overshadow the art itself.
  • Permanent links & portability – Stable links to collections and showcases, so bookmarks and embeds never break.
  • Collaboration features – Options for co-curation or shared subsets of collections (DAOs, groups, joint exhibitions).
  • Privacy controls – Flexible visibility settings for public, private, or selective sharing.
  • Collector statements/notes – Space to add commentary on why a work was collected or its significance.

Why This Matters

rarible.fun feels designed primarily for flippers and reward farmers. This shift in focus overlooks collectors and artists, who have always been the foundation of Rarible’s community.

Rarible was strongest when it supported both sides of the ecosystem. The current direction makes it harder to celebrate, organize, and share art. If collectors feel fragmented and artists feel invisible, Rarible risks losing the very people who give the platform cultural weight.

This is an opportunity to choose what Rarible stands for. The platform can either double down on short-term farming mechanics, or it can recommit to being a place where art and culture remain at the center. Without that, there’s no reason for collectors or artists to call Rarible home.

4 Likes

Thank you for bringing this up, @Firefly808

I can resonate with some of your concerns here as someone who lost some of my work when a community I contributed to took down its YouTube page during restructuring. These sorts of changes are quite detrimental to contributors who have spent years building in public.

@forexus, It would be great to talk about some of these concerns tomorrow during the governance call

4 Likes

Thank you for the constructive feedback @Firefly808
Since I am moderating the Rarible discord server + telegram, I got a quite good feeling about the immediate concerns that arised within the artist community after Rarible FUN went live and replaced OG Rarible. They pretty much share your view.

Please be aware that mentioned missing features like profile pages and verified badges will be implemented later on. It’s just not ready yet as I understood. As the marketplace update pretty much is the new Rarible, we need to build on top of that.

I am sure there is time during tomorrows governance call to discuss this all together, let’s do it.

4 Likes

this should be fixed

2 Likes

Thank you so much, @Firefly808 for addressing these concerns to the DAO. I’m looking forward to hearing @forexus observations and feedback in our Governance call, since based upon his alignment with the community to hear if this is something that will affect the Creator Fund program?

3 Likes

Thanks for raising this @Firefly808. Maybe Foundation can get you in touch with the Rarible team to make some adjustments?

1 Like