Voted: For
Rational: I voted in favor for this proposal and the Account Abstraction upgrade is a critical security and compatibility improvement essential for the protocol’s long-term health. Although I support the technical merits, I remain concerned that the proposal does not outline a comprehensive plan for communicating these changes to third-party partners to prevent ecosystem disruption.
RRC‑XX: Fund Phase 2 of RARI Staking Rewards
Voted: Against
Rational: While I appreciate the authors addressing my concerns about a communications plan to the users and the inclusion of how this proposal superseeds RRC-43 for discontinuation for Phase 3.
However, I am voting against because this proposal fails to include the transaction to return the ~14,200 RARI surplus (Phase 1 leftovers + cancelled Phase 3) to the DAO Treasury immediately.
The 2025 Operational Budget (RRC-37) contains a clause stating: ‘If there are unspent funds at the end of the budget cycle, the Foundation may propose to keep the amount in an operational reserve.’
By leaving these staking funds in the Foundation’s wallet without a clawback today, there is a potential that it being absorbed into next year’s operational reserve by default, and handling it with a future decision creates an unnecessary governance debt.
Voted: For
Rational: I voted FOR this revised proposal, and I commend the author for listening to delegate feedback and concerns including mine, by abandoning the originally proposed ETH-to-RARI swap. Maintaining our ETH exposure is the right move for the treasury. I look forward to the first transparency report confirming the deployment partner and the projected yield (estimated at ~$3K/year). Specifically, I expect the reporting to clarify the final destination of these funds, whether they are being auto-compounded back into the DAO treasury or utilized for future Foundation operational costs.