Make a button so people can generate NFTs using AI, maybe create videos from already known NFTs.
Create a YouTube channel that will make entertaining and news content to attract people.
Create a game inside Telegram related to NFTs. (Maybe make some characteristics for NFTs, a battle.)
Revive your Twitter. It’s in the shadow ban. I don’t know how. (Maybe create a bot in Telegram that will give RARI for reposts and likes?)
In the end, NFTs may have died forever. Maybe switch to games? and make the token a currency for games.
Buy advertising on coinzilla.com. $1,000-5,000 for the test. So that people know that RARI exists.
I’ll take the opportunity.
Give this guy’s collections PaintStore.io (me) stars at least, at most advertise his projects. Is ElonPunk that strict?
ElonPunk Pixel is free. Give it to all RARI holders.
I like the idea of an nft based game, there are many options for that as well as options for expansion and for promoting new artists on rarible. I also like the idea of a mini game inside, telegram, telegram seems to be a popular spot for games of such types. There is a plethora of styles that could be done in.I am however not so big on the idea of generating nfts with AI help being an artist, I prefer to keep the computer out of it. I feel that if it’s true art, it is made by a human hand and The little imperfections are what make it unique… but if it is decided to use AI button, maybe devise a way where they have to purchase credits to use the button so it has two bolster. rari revinue
Well these days it should be easy enough for a computer programe to tell if it was propagated using an AI or not… but even for some reason there is not i have no need to prove it to anyone i will know also if there is anyone who enjoys my art wil also and that is sufficient… i am definitely not an artist to become famous or rich. I do it for the love of creativity. As for AI Art being better i disagree, it is perfect, perfectly sterile just like a surgery suite at a hospital… real art has flaws that is what makes it unique and gives it character truly making it original but thats not all… embracing technology is a necessity to advance in certain aspects of life but for the human race to continue to exist and evolve into a more enlightened resistance you can not remove what defines us as human. Free will and emotion. Art, all forms, music, sculpting, architecture, engineering, writing. These are the extension of the emotions of their creator an outlet for emotional release and expression whish is what keeps us growing and healthy mentally… these things you can see and feel in the pieces that are great art. There is not one revered artist of past that is loved necklace there are is perfect and sterile… AI has its place this is just not one of them and people will tire of the fad
@doxcoin thanks for sharing these ideas. While the proposal brings up intriguing concepts, it lacks depth and structure, making it hard to evaluate feasibility or align with strategic objectives. As a first step, it’s good to spark discussion, but refining these into well-thought-out initiatives would make them more actionable.
Regarding Rarible’s direction, it seems to have a strong brand identity, but it would be helpful if Rarible shared explicit guidelines or a cohesive vision with the Foundation. This would ensure alignment and reinforce a unified strategy across both entities. Here are my thoughts on the points raised:
AI for NFTs: This could be a powerful optional tool, especially if tied to monetization through RARI. It could enable users who lack resources to create compelling NFTs, but its integration must prioritize intellectual property rights, ownership, and trust. A carefully designed pilot program could test its value without alienating traditional creators. The goal should be complementing human creativity, not replacing it.
YouTube channel: Rarible already delivers great value through its channel, but the Foundation could enhance this by launching one focused on governance, similar to what Tally has done. Monthly videos summarizing proposals, decisions, and strategy could provide clarity for delegates and onboarding for newcomers. This initiative is cost-effective and impactful, requiring only a dedicated content creator with governance expertise.
Telegram games: While engaging, these feel misaligned with Rarible’s focus on empowering artists. Games that lack direct ties to the creator economy or NFT utility risk diluting the platform’s reputation. Without clear strategic value, I’d deprioritize this.
Reviving Twitter visibility: A simple and organic approach is encouraging delegates to enable notifications and retweet posts, ensuring at least 10 retweets per post. This would increase reach without costs. Using bots, on the other hand, risks damaging credibility. Incentivized engagement campaigns that spotlight creators or feature contests could offer more authentic visibility.
RARI and gaming: Pivoting RARI’s utility toward gaming feels disconnected from Rarible’s identity. Instead, I’d focus on strengthening the personalized marketplace feature, which is a key differentiator. Improving these tools to attract more creators and collectors aligns with Rarible’s core vision and adds genuine value to its ecosystem.
I hope this comment was helpful, and I’m always open to continuing the discussion and assisting wherever I can.
