I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: Voted yes on this proposal since this is the first time all of the delegate actually receive their incentives from the delegate work they’ve been doing. This will actually pay everyone that met the requirements.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: Great budget for a great rewards campaign centering the new governance model, can’t wait to see what the guys have been cooking and see staking go live on the Rari Chain in a couple of weeks.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: Simple test proposal in the new RARI Chain governed DAO, to celebrate that I voted yes.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: We wanted to see if the security council veto vote worked, and it did! Thats why there was a positive vote.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: This proposal approves the 25,000 RARI, as already agreed, for the first phase of the staking campaign. I totally agree with this, without these tokens there wouldn’t be incentives.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: As voted yes earlier in RRC-42, it was supposed to go through the DAO, however, due to bad market situations and not so much being done by the delegates, the proposal was defeated. Have reconsidered my vote again after this.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: After a good chat with eachother in an emergency governance call the delegate incentive program was adjusted to satisfy everyone. Happy that the adjusted proposal did see the daylight.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: A great and affordable opportunity to get the word out for $RARI. What attracted me were the strong partnerships they had with brands like Adobe and Uniswap. Excited to see what the future will bring.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: After being a delegate in the DAO for nearly 2 years, we’ve finally managed to write a proposal that met the standards of the Rari Foundation and was not only welcomed by everyone else, but we also secured a $100k grant fund in order to attract the right projects, creators and brands towards Rarible. Ofcourse I had to vote yes for this proposal!
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: The superboard quest participants have been waiting long enough for their rewards, i’ve voted yes because I see the urgency in speeding up the distribution of those rewards. On to the future!
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: A much needed action in order to secure a sustainable reward system on the new Rarible.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: Since i’ve worked on this myself ofcourse I have voted yes. Essentail for the future of the Rarible Creator Fund and proper curation.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: The poll on the forum was an exciting period and 4 out of the 6 participants were seriously competing for the top 2. It pretty much resembled a battle between contributions in my view. While myself and @jarisjames contributed with the Rarible Creator Fund Program and working group, while @WinVerse especially had strong contributions to the DAO in the past. On the other hand @coffee-crusher has been making some noise lately and has been organising the security council elections herself. In the end only 2 participants could get elected and I believe it is a fair outcome conform the Code of Conduct in the DAO.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: I support this proposal since I believe it is important for the RARI Foundation to be able to take financial decisions more quickly, besides having to go through a DAO and meeting several camps. While this is a big event that sunsets the v1 Treasury, access to these funds will be much needed for a bright future.
I’ve voted yes for this proposal:
Rationale: Due to some techincal issues the last similar proposal had to be reposted, the team has fixed the technical issue and this should be able to get executed. Excited to see this finally unfold! Important for the rewards on Rarible.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: Loved seeing the strong partnerships, alignment with Rarible and the creative value of this proposal. While not awarding the full ask we’re supporting Burrito DAO with $3000 USD in Ethereum and are looking forward to the start of this event!
Did an update on the forum, any feedback would be greatly appreciated!
Thought I missed a bunch new posts when I first hopped in. 
Yeah some posts got up’d when I moved or archived them 
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale:
Exciting to vote yes on this proposal for a third time, let’s hope this time everything gets executed correctly. Important for the RARI rewards on the new Rarible.
Vote: Yes
Rationale:
Great upgrade to the protocol, finally get to full support for AA and Smart Contract Wallets. The futurs is here!
Vote: yes
Rationale: After having a discussion on the forum the majority agreed on a continuation of the Staking Rewards. Looking to the current RARI price this is a complete no brainer.
Vote: yes
Rationale: No objections against putting idle funds to work.
Vote: no
Rationale: The author of the proposal hasn’t followed the guidelines of the RARI Foundation, therefor not following established governance processes. On top of that, I do not know who the proposer is. These 2 arguments made me vote NO.
I’ve voted yes on this proposal:
Rationale: Onto 1 governance system, smaller delegate groups and a focused Foundation. Narrowing down on the security council will most likely result in 2 of us losing our seats. It is fair however looking to the current state of our delegate activity. On to the future!
I’ve voted NO in this proposal:
Rationale: It’s a malicious proposal without any explanation or forum discussion happening. It’s my job as a delegate to vote against this.